Small improvements

purchase_usability_extension/purchase_view.xml

@@ -42,6 +42,21 @@
         <field name="amount_total" position="after">
             <field name="currency_id" groups="base.group_multi_currency"/>
         </field>
+        <field name="state" position="before">
+            <field name="shipped"/>
+        </field>
+    </field>
+</record>
+
+<record id="view_purchase_order_filter" model="ir.ui.view">
+    <field name="name">usability.purchase.order.tree</field>
+    <field name="model">purchase.order</field>
+    <field name="inherit_id" ref="purchase.view_purchase_order_filter"/>
+    <field name="arch" type="xml">
+        <filter name="not_invoiced" position="after">
+            <filter name="shipped" string="Fully Received" domain="[('shipped', '=', True)]"/>
+            <filter name="not_shipped" string="Not Fully Received" domain="[('shipped', '=', False)]"/>
+        </filter>
     </field>
 </record>
 

stock_usability/stock_view.xml

@@ -142,5 +142,24 @@ in the quantities for his reception -->
     </field>
 </record>
 
+<record id="view_move_tree_receipt_picking" model="ir.ui.view">
+    <field name="name">stock.usability.stock.move.tree2</field>
+    <field name="model">stock.move</field>
+    <field name="inherit_id" ref="stock.view_move_tree_receipt_picking"/>
+    <field name="arch" type="xml">
+        <field name="partner_id" position="attributes">
+            <attribute name="string">Destination Address</attribute>
+            <!-- The partner_id field on stock.move has a label "Destination Address"
+            but a stupid guy has put a string="Supplier" on the tree view
+            And, as this field is very often empty, the users think there is a bug
+            because the supplier is not set ! -->
+date_expected
+        </field>
+        <field name="date_expected" position="attributes">
+            <attribute name="invisible">0</attribute>
+        </field>
+    </field>
+</record>
+
 </data>
 </openerp>